
Sensiq remembers, reuses, and strengthens the reasoning behind every yes, no, and not-yet — so your organisation compounds hiring judgment instead of restarting from scratch every time a role closes.
Most hiring tools track workflow. They do not preserve the reasoning.
A candidate moves through stages, gets a yes or a no, and the sentences that produced that yes or no are lost the moment the requisition closes. The next time a similar role opens, your team starts from zero — not because the work wasn't done, but because the work wasn't kept.
Sensiq exists for the part the rest of the stack throws away.
Every Sensiq card composes one decision into a single artifact: CV evidence, must-have read, recruiter verdict, hiring manager context, reasoning. Locked. Dated. Reusable.
Cards are not reports — they are what the dossier reads from, the deck shares from, and the assistant reasons over.
Every CV review, interview, recruiter note, hiring manager response, and verdict adds context to a candidate's record. Sensiq composes that record as a dossier — a chronological, full-fidelity read your team can call on.
Over time something quietly important happens: your organisation stops losing people just because they were wrong for one role. The candidate evaluated for Revenue Operations Lead in March is still legible when a Senior Revenue Operations Manager role opens in June — same evidence, same words, no Slack archaeology.
Hiring memory is what turns who we interviewed into what we already know.
When a new role opens, Sensiq quietly checks who in your existing memory has shown clean signal for work like this before. Past evaluations resurface in the right rail — present the entire time the recruiter reads the role.
There is no notification, no badge, no "AI suggests." The candidate is simply present, named, with the basis for the surfacing in plain language. No automatic action is taken.
Sensiq doesn't lose a candidate because one role wasn't right. It writes the rejection down with the reasoning intact, and keeps the parts of the read that are still true — so the next time a role opens where those signals matter, the candidate is back on the table with the original evidence attached.
When a hiring manager needs to see the basis for a recommendation, the deck opens in their browser as a read-only, dated record of how your team made the call. Hiring managers review on their own time. Agencies hand decisions to clients without a follow-up call. Stakeholders see the same evidence your team saw — not a summary of it.
The reasoning is preserved verbatim — what stands out, what to watch, the cross-role echo, the score. Empty fields stay empty. The deck shows the reasoning your team actually wrote, and only that.
Past evidence on Maya Chen's Senior Revenue Operations work, shared as a Decision Pack.
Pipeline forecasting cadence — owned at adjacent role, named explicitly in CV summary.
Sensiq Assistant is not generic chat. It reads from the same cards, dossiers, decks, and roles your team produces — so it can answer recruiter and hiring-manager questions with the actual reasoning attached.
Use it to draft a hiring-manager summary from a card. Compare two candidates against the same must-haves. Pull every evaluation a candidate has across roles. Write a rejection note that doesn't lose the parts of the candidate worth remembering.
The assistant has read what you wrote — including the parts you wrote six months ago.
Maya's Revenue Operations Lead card flagged Senior-level GTM scope as a partial must-have; the Senior Revenue Operations Manager card replaced that with Pipeline forecasting cadence, where her evidence was clean.
Score moved 70 → 83 on the same candidate, same dossier, different rubric.
Sensiq does not replace the recruiter's decision. It preserves the evidence, context, and reasoning behind it — so the organisation can reuse what it has already learned.
Hiring teams already have workflows. Sensiq strengthens the layer underneath them: the memory of what was seen, discussed, challenged, and ultimately decided.
The candidate was never the thing that got lost.
The reasoning was.